Normally, I don’t like blogging about issues on
which I have a pecuniary interest, so I should begin by saying “consider the
source” when you read what follows.
Still, I represent a constituency that apparently has no champions in positions
of power. So if people like me don’t
call out the facts, who will?
Here are the
federal civilian pay increases and the corresponding CPI increases for the
previous year.
Federal pay increases CPI
increases for the previous year
2019 0.0 2.2%
2018 1.4% 2.1
2017 1.0 1.3
2016 1.0 0.1
2015 1.0 1.6
2014 1.0 1.5
2013 0.0 2.1
2012 0.0 3.2
2011 0.0 1.6
9-yr Avg
0.6% 1.75%
In essence, federal civil service compensation has
effectively dropped well over 10% during this decade alone, and that doesn’t
even count the ways in which benefits have been cut in recent years or the way
inflation-adjusted salaries have been decreased in past decades. Moreover, these recent decisions to reduce Civil
Servant compensation are obviously bi-partisan; just consider who was President
during most of these years and the lack of outrage among the Democratic
legislators who passed his budgets . We
all heard no shortage of crocodile tears shed by Democratic legislators during
the 2018-19 Shutdown about the plight of the federal workers. But you can thank numbers like the ones above
for why so many civil servants were hurting so much in January.
The rumor is that, as we speak, the Democrats and
GOP are close to a deal to avert another Shutdown. Do you think demanding a pay increase commemorate
with increases in the CPI is something that the Dems are demanding as a pre-condition
to do the deal? Hopefully, that’s what
is happening. Yet I have seen no such
reports in the media. In fact, I hear
crickets on this entire topic.
The fact is that neither party has shown much
concern for the drop in compensation for civil servants over the past few
decades, let alone the effect of that drop on morale and recruitment. I’m not saying the two parties are equally
unconcerned, but this time I’m not even going to bother to point out which one
is worse. Just look at those years from
2011 to 2013, when Barack Obama was President.
Where was the Democratic Party uproar then? Where is it now that there are no more
political points to be scored by raising the issue?
There is no disputing that, on an aggregate basis, the average
civil servant is paid more than the average non-civil servant. To some, that would make us overpaid – and indeed,
many lawmakers cite the aggregate pay gap between the public and private sector
as a justification for continuing to dock civil service pay relative to the
rate of inflation. But you don’t have to
be an astrophysicist or a brain scientist to realize that it makes zero sense to
compare the salaries of, on the one hand, a NASA astro-physicist or NIH brain
researcher to, on the other hand, a burger flipper at Wendy’s or a telemarketer
with “your local carpet cleaning service.”
The better comparison would be to compare the salaries of government
astro-physicists with their analogues in the private sector, and do the same
with brain scientists, economists, attorneys, or whatever. But Congress knows better than to commission
that kind of comparison. It wouldn’t be “fiscally
prudent.”
Clearly, there are more pressing issues in the world
to think about than this one. Then
again, unless the topic is climate change, that could be said about any
topic. I simply felt compelled this
week, now that we may be on the verge of another budget deal, to raise a
concern that sticks in the craw of those “800,000 people” -- of which I am one -- that our nation’s demagogues
kept talking about since Christmas.
Truly, this is just a microcosm of the way the members of our media and our politicians
play games with us – selecting some issues to obsess about, ignoring other
important issues altogether, and constantly tossing rhetoric around as if they
really care. Sadly, the American people
know better. That’s one reason neither
of those groups is terribly popular with either side of the political
spectrum.
No comments:
Post a Comment