Martin Luther King, Jr. had his dream. I had mine.
His dream was to live in a country where one day, people would be judged
by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.
Mine was to live in a country where one day, people
would elect a woman President who had been relentlessly vilified by the
greatest personal attack machine known to humankind (the contemporary
Republican party) but who had the perfect combination of characteristics needed
to weather those attacks (poise, class, inner strength, resolve, kindness,
intelligence, wisdom, etc.).
As I explained in a recent post, I am so sick of the
politics of personal destruction and so sick of political sexism (which allows
people with a straight face to call Elizabeth Warren “shrill” when at the same
time they find Bernie Sanders’ yelling perfectly acceptable) that I desperately
sought a Presidential candidate who (a) is female, and (b) has the kind of
personal sexism-proof characteristics that make her electable. My hope was that
maybe, just maybe, the election of such an individual wouldn’t simply put to an
end the national embarrassment that we have never had a woman leader in our 242
year history but would also put a dent in the kind of political sexism that
makes me so sick. Accordingly, as soon
as the Midterms were over, I endorsed for President of the United States
Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.
In offering that endorsement, I referred to Ms.
Klobuchar as “Minnesota Nice.” I have
noticed over the years the way she presents herself publicly and saw the kind
of person who could withstand the Republican attacks that are sure to come in
spades. Having judged her by her public
appearances, I had included her in a certain category of calm, unflappable,
strong and brilliant women who I’ve been privileged, on occasion, to work with
over the decades. Now, I’m starting to
wonder if I had jumped the gun by offering this endorsement.
What I have subsequently learned is that Ms.
Klobuchar has a proven track record for being one heck of a tough boss. According to Legistorm, an organization that
tracks Congressional turnover rates, during the period from 2001 to 2016, Ms.
Klobuchar had the highest annual staff turnover rate in the Senate (36%). Indeed, she was the only Senator of either
party whose turnover index was more than twice the Senate average.
Is that disqualifying? No.
But it is troublesome. Because if
you think the job of a Senator is stressful, you should try the job of
Presidential candidate who is taking on the greatest personal attack machine known
to humankind (Swift Boating, anyone?).
And if you think that job is stressful, you should try actually being
the President who has to clean up the current situation. The last thing we need is a stress level and turnover
rate that are through the roof.
The Legistorm data suggests that there is more to
Ms. Klobuchar than her “Minnesota Nice” exterior would suggest. I’m not suggesting any deep character flaws
here, or even that she is not a nice person. What I am saying is this issue
bears closer scrutiny. The Democrats can’t
afford to screw up this nominating process after having screwed up the last
one. We had better nominate someone who
connects with Ronald Reagan Democrats and Bill Clinton Republicans, appears relatively
unflappable on the stump (remember, “No Drama Obama”), and who doesn’t come
across as a technocrat or a phony.
In short, I had a dream that we’d soon be electing
Amy Klobuchar. But if we have to elect
someone like, oh I don’t know, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, that will work just
fine.
No comments:
Post a Comment