Katie Lou Samuelson
Moriah Jefferson
Morgan Tuck
Have you ever heard of them?
How about Breanna Stewart?
Tina Charles?
Familiar with those names?
Maya Moore?
Still no? I’m
not surprised. Those are among the
names most responsible for the University of Connecticut basketball team’s two
insanely long winning streaks in the past decade – a 90-game winning streak
that went on from 2008-2011, and a 101-game winning streak that started in 2014
and is still going strong. The
individuals listed above should be household names, but they’re not. And that, of course, is because those
phenomenal athletes are women. Imagine a
men’s team with two winning streaks totaling nearly 200 games, or even half
that long. Somehow, I doubt its top
players would be laboring in obscurity.
This was supposed to be the year of the woman. We were supposed to have the first female
President in history by now. Remember
her? There are a number of reasons why
Hillary is in New York and Donald is in the White House, and much of the blame
can surely be placed on Hillary and the DNC.
But just as surely, Hillary was also the victim of pervasive
sexism. Despite all of our hopes to the
contrary, sexism in our society is still alive and well.
I’ve never forgotten that old Henry Kissinger line, “No
one will ever win the battle of the sexes; there is too much fraternizing with
the enemy.” It is partially correct. Most of us men do love women – both individual
women and even the female gender taken in the abstract – so the last thing we
want to do is wage a “battle” against them.
But clearly, we don’t very much love watching them play basketball, or
any other sport for that matter. And we
don’t love watching them get on the stump and exclaim why their vision of
governance is better than that of their opponent. We call such female politicians obnoxious,
aggressive, off-putting . . .
I just call it sexism.
Just consider the two de facto leaders of the
post-Hillary Clinton Democratic Party. I’m
referring to those two unabashed progressives, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren. Bernie can yell all he wants on
the stump and we’ll still call him avuncular or even lovable. Liz?
When she yells, we call her shrill or a scold, or whatever other insult
comes to mind for an “uppity” woman. No,
that term uppity doesn’t get used any more, but honestly, it describes
precisely the way many people feel about a woman who is righteously indignant
and not afraid to explain why.
If you don’t agree, please explain to me what the analogue
is of “avuncular” for a woman. Or more
generally, what flattering adjectives we have for women when they get older. This isn’t just a problem with our
vocabulary. It’s a problem with our
culture.
It is one thing to dis an entire gender when they
are young and athletic. It’s another to
dis them when they are mature, wise, and passionate about how to uplift the
world, especially when the other gender has done such a robust job of screwing
things up.
We can no longer afford to ignore our biases. And believe me, the problem isn’t simply the
way men think about women, for many women suffer from the same prejudice. For years, the “fairer sex” was thought of in
a supporting role. That started changing
a half-century ago. Back in the late 60s
and 70s, it would have been reasonable to expect that by now, we’d be over this
blind spot. But old prejudices die
hard. It is incumbent on each of us to
recognize those prejudices in ourselves and eradicate them from our behavior,
at least where they are most important.
You have my permission to ignore the Connecticut
women’s basketball team – or for that matter, the undefeated men’s basketball
team from Gonzaga. But you don’t have my
permission to ignore female statesmen who have the temerity to raise their
voice at horrible injustice, gross inefficiency, or widespread apathy. Perhaps they’ll sound too “shrill” to be “avuncular,”
but that’s fine – take it upon yourself to find some complimentary words that
work for mature female leaders. Just consider
what you love about your favorite aunt, or if you have no favorite aunt, use
your mother. How would you describe
her? What positive qualities most come
to mind? And don’t we need more people with those
qualities running this country? To ask
the question is to answer it.
No comments:
Post a Comment