“If nature has made any one thing
less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the
thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as
long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself
into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of
it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because
every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me,
receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper
at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread
from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of
man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and
benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over
all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in
which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement
or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of
property.”
— Thomas Jefferson
If
Jefferson was alive today, he’d surely chuckle at the common use of the term “intellectual
property.” It might even become one of
his favorite oxymorons.
Lately,
I’ve been witnessing an idea of mine come alive, and I’ve enjoyed the results
so much that I am encouraging anyone who reads this blogpost to please steal this
idea and run with it. I have nothing to
lose if you do. I have no intention to
turn it into private property. It
belongs to the world.
The
idea involves putting on a program known as a God Panel. The panelists are composed of a small group of
people each of whom adheres to an altogether different perspective on God. Each of the panelists must be able to behave
civilly, and hopefully bring a little humor and no shortage of passion to the
table. The panel must include at least
one unabashed atheist. It must also
include believers in God who come from a traditional religious perspective and
a progressive (i.e., heterodox) perspective, respectively.
The questions in the
Part 1 of the program are intended to elucidate, among other things: how the
panelists view God; in the case of believers, what frustrates them most about
non-believers, and vice versa; and what common ground the panelists have
found. It is critical that there is at least one
atheist on the panel who will say, “I may not believe in God, but at least I
care about the topic, and I’d like to see the members of our society engage more
about it.” That voice is critical,
because it will remind everyone in the audience that just as it would be a
shame not to care about art, music, literature or science, it is also a shame
to remain on a third-grade level when it comes to the topics of religion and
God. You see, one of the goals of the
program should be to challenge the audience both intellectually and emotionally
about a topic that people are increasingly able to blow off altogether.
During the past 2 ½ months,
four of us – Jew, Muslim, Christian and Atheist – have participated in God
Panel sessions at numerous Washington D.C. area venues. We have found that the program works wonderfully
both at places of worship and at university settings and we even headlined a conference
on science and religion. As long as the
voices are impassioned and truly diverse, the questions are rich, and the speakers
are disciplined enough not to talk too long at any one sitting, the audience
cannot help but be stimulated. The best
thing about this idea is it may be replicated anywhere you can find a little religious
diversity and a host community willing to tolerate multiple perspectives.
So, whether you live in
Dallas, Portland, London, or Tel Aviv … give it a try. Get a panel together – hopefully one where
the panelists like each other – knock on some doors, and be prepared to open
some minds. I’m not sure this idea will
work in, say, Mosul, but that’s OK. Because
if you want to put on a God Panel program and find that there is neither the
tolerance nor the interest in the area for such a program, you will have
learned something very important. It’s
time to take out your communicator and say “Beam me up, Scotty, there’s no
intelligent life down here.”
Oh wait. That phrase was turned into a T-Shirt. Perhaps I’ve wandered into the realm of
intellectual property. So maybe you’re
wise not to use it. Just stick with the
God Panel idea. Mr. Spock would approve
… and so would Jefferson.
No comments:
Post a Comment