I’m headed across the
pond on Tuesday evening to a small island in the North Atlantic. That means that this will be my last post
until August. It also means that I’ve
got England on the brain.
Rather than looking
forward to my trip, I’d rather look back – in particular, to the “fortnight”
that was Wimbledon. Whether or not
you’re a tennis fan, it was quite a championship. First and foremost, most people will tell
you, this will be the Wimbledon remembered as the end of an era in British
futility. For the first time in 77
years, Wimbledon crowned an Englishman as champion. Admittedly, there are some Cubs fans who
would die for that kind of success, but outside of the north side of Chicago,
it’s considered quite the streak from Hell.
Congratulations to Andy Murray for finally getting that monkey off Her
Majesty’s back. And given that he has
now won two major championships in less than a year, who knows? He could become the next number one player in
the sport. But even if he wins four
majors in a row, he won’t top last Sunday’s achievement.
So,
this past Wimbledon was Murray’s tourney, right? Not for me.
I’ll remember it more for the women’s side of the draw. By the semifinals, it was clear that the
tournament would be won by someone who had never before won a major
championship. I can’t remember the last
time that’s happened. And the winner,
Marion Bartoli, had played in 46 major tournaments before she finally won
#47. That broke the old record by two,
and established Ms. Bartoli as a true Cinderella Story.
By
all rights, Bartoli should have been able to celebrate her record-setting
victory in absolute peace, just like Murray did. But alas, in her finest hour, she became a
victim of one of the stupidest comments I have ever heard made by a prominent
broadcaster – and that’s saying a lot.
The
comment reminded me of the way some of the boys spoke when I was growing
up. Let’s say they saw a girl who was
drop dead gorgeous. She might be called
a “fox.” Now, let’s say they saw a girl
was considered average looking. Her
looks might be ignored altogether. (In
hindsight, I call that a blessing.) And
now, let’s say they saw a girl they considered less attractive than
average. She was called a “dog.” It’s bad enough that one member of the
canine family gets the royal treatment and the other becomes associated with
sheer ugliness. But why would someone
suggest that another person is sub-human simply because of her physical
appearance? I can’t decide if that comment
is more offensive or more stupid.
And
I feel the same way about the comment made last week by BBC commentator John
Inverdale with respect to Bartoli. If
you were listening to Radio 5 Live in Britain, here’s what you would have heard
out of Inverdale’s mouth: "Do you think Bartoli's dad told her when she
was little, 'you're never going to be a looker, you'll never be a Sharapova, so
you have to be scrappy and fight?'"
Come
again? Methinks Inverdale was calling
Bartoli a dog. Well, do you mind if I call
him a pig? It’s true that Bartoli is a
brunette, whereas Sharapova is a blonde.
It’s true that Bartoli is 5’ 7”, whereas Sharapova is 6’ 2”. And I’ll even go a step further in
recognizing that Bartoli has never modeled, as far as I know, whereas Sharapova
is a stunning model. But the last I
checked, Bartoli was standing with the Wimbledon trophy whereas Sharapova
didn’t get out of the second round. So
why is Inverdale praising Sharapova and insulting Bartoli? I thought I had been watching a tennis
match. Apparently, Inverdale thought he
was in a strip club – he’ll let the “dogs” in, but not without a snide comment.
And
snide it was. He didn’t just suggest
that Bartoli was ugly. He raised the
idea that hers was a look that not even a father can love. That would have to be pretty hideous –
three-eyeballs, two-noses kind of hideous.
Because if there is anyone who can appreciate the beauty in a girl, it’s
her father.
Maybe
Inverdale didn’t have those kinds of parents.
Maybe he comes from a rough family, where compliments and kindness are
viewed as signs of weakness. But please,
don’t try to bring another family into your Hellhole, Sir. Fortunately, the champ’s father, Dr. Walter
Bartoli, wasn’t biting. Having heard about
Inverdale’s comments – both he and Marion were asked to respond to them – Walter
Bartoli’s words were short and oh so sweet:
“I am not angry. She is my beautiful daughter.”
Indeed. Perhaps Marion Bartoli doesn’t have the face
of a model. She certainly doesn’t have a
model’s body. But she is by all
accounts, smart, athletic, tenacious, and warm. And if you Google her when she is not
pouncing on a tennis ball, you can’t help but see her beauty come through.
That
is, unless you’re the type that thinks of 40% of the female gender “dogs.”
BBC – I hope that jerk is off the air by the
time I arrive at Heathrow on Wednesday morning.
2 comments:
Dan,
I don't follow tennis but that's an impressive father
http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/8191599/tennis-marion-bartoli-ditch-dad-play-olympics
Dan,
I don't follow tennis but that's an impressive father
http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/8191599/tennis-marion-bartoli-ditch-dad-play-olympics
Post a Comment