THE
CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST
You have to pardon me
for not blogging extensively this weekend.
I’m spending the weekend the same way I’ve spent much of every weekend
during the last 2 1/2 months – working on my job with the federal government. It’s the same way I spent this past Wednesday
– in the office, just like a number of my colleagues, even though the
government was officially “closed” because of inclement weather. And it’s the same way I will spend part of
tomorrow. Just doing my “cushy
government job.”
The truth is that plenty
of devoted civil servants regularly put in long, long hours working on the
country’s business. Nearly all of us
are about to get a pay cut ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars,
depending upon how long this stupid “sequestration” situation is going to
last. And this pay cut – otherwise known
as a “furlough” – is on top of having to endure years without a cost-of-living
increase. That’s the life of being a
federal employee these days.
Does America care about
the lack of cost of living increases and impending furloughs for federal workers? Or about the impending cuts to services that
the federal government offers to the public?
I suspect most of America aren’t the least bit concerned. In fact, roughly half of those who do care are
probably happy about this development. They have been bombarded over the radio and TV
with the notion that cutting the pay of lazy, overpaid bureaucrats is surely a
good thing, and trimming a bloated government is long overdue. That’s
the hard-right view of sequestration.
The amazing thing to me is how our progressive Democratic President
agreed to this idea in the first place.
If I had a better sense
of humor, perhaps I would view this whole sequestration situation as a big
joke. Supposedly, our President went
down this road because he thought sequestration would be so asinine, because of
the indiscriminate nature of the program cuts, that we couldn’t possibly allow
it to happen. Accordingly, we would by
necessity come together and figure out a sensible way to trim the National
Debt. Apparently, he was sufficiently impressed by
the rationality and moderation of our Congress that he was sure they would reach
an agreement on how to deal with the budget.
And now that we’re looking those cuts in the face, what is the President
doing? What else but playing the blame
game. Allegedly, the situation is
entirely the fault of the Republicans for not compromising with the President’s
view of debt reduction. I have no doubt
that if I were to watch MSNBC in the evening, which I haven’t lately, I would
hear pundit after pundit place the entire blame for this mess on Republican
shoulders. Personally, I’m not buying
it. A pox on both their houses, I say.
Folks, we are finally
reaping the consequences of being led by out-of-touch politicians who work in a
thoroughly polarized political environment.
In this type of situation, we should expect irrational outcomes, and
anyone who counts on rationality is the one who is truly clueless. When the system works – that’s the real
shocker. For those of us who have been
watching our political process for a number of decades, what’s particularly
fascinating is how much worse it is now than it used to be in the mid-20th
century. When America was at its peak,
our government worked efficiently. We
had strong, respected leaders in the executive branch, and the legislative
branch was run by moderates. Now? We have a professor in the executive branch
who doesn’t seem to understand the climate in which he operates, except on a
theoretical basis. And as for the
legislative branch, that is increasingly populated by loopy ideologues and
others who fear that they must pander to extremists or risk losing their seats.
Together, they’re about to perform
surgery on the federal budget using a butcher knife instead of a scalpel. Trust me – we will all pay for this insanity
and not just federal employees.
The greatest irony of all is that
there truly is fat to cut in our government, but we’re just not going to
concentrate on cutting that fat; we’ll cut the lean, too. Think about all the federal programs that are
luxury items we can afford to live without.
And think about all the humongous outlays that go to government
contractors who charge us for workers who cost a multiple of what they would
cost if the government hired them directly.
Reflect, too, about all the retired-in-place employees who never seem to
lose their jobs. Every agency has them,
and some have a lot of them, but they’ll do no worse under the sequestration
rules than the most productive employees in the government.
If
there was a good deal to be had, the time to broker it was around the New Year
before our government decided to increase taxes on some high-income
households. After that point, the GOP
could legitimately say that they compromised on taxes already, and now it is
time for the Democrats to compromise on expenses. In reality, we still need plenty of new
revenues – in the form of gutting these absurd loopholes in the tax code. Then again, changes are also needed in
programs like Social Security and Medicare, which are facing one hell of a
shock to the system as more and more of my fellow baby boomers retire.
Both
sides ought to have the will to compromise.
Right now, though, neither side can resist playing politics. So what do we have? Sacrifices that are NOT equitably
shared. As one of those who will bear
more than his share of the brunt, let me just say that I’m disgusted by the
politicians who are running this country into the ground.
In
spite of those politicians, I still plan on getting the rest of my work done
this weekend. If some of my colleagues
decide to approach their jobs more apathetically, however, I don’t plan on
blaming them. Not these days. As the old saw goes, “you get what you pay
for.” And if America is apathetic about
how much they’re paying for government services, don’t be surprised if they get
their money’s worth – and no more.
No comments:
Post a Comment