Friday, June 06, 2008


In the upcoming months, I will explain why this country doesn’t just NEED Barack Obama, but more importantly, why it wants him. I will also explain why now is WAY past the time for John McCain, whose day should have come in 2000 but his political party had its head up its tuchus and cared more about getting elected than governing a nation. The consequences of that choice for the entire world speak for themselves, wouldn’t you say?

So, “my friends,” as Mr. Iraq War likes to say, you’ll get my pontification soon enough. Just not this morning. I’m going to save you my attempts at reading tea leaves, or speculating about the minds of old ladies from Lansing or young men from Columbus. I’m simply going to point out two numbers -- the current betting odds from Intrade.

Intrade reports the odds that candidates will win elections. has listed Intrade numbers for a while, and today, I saw them listed in The people whose bets are reflected on Intrade put their money where their mouth is. Unlike the political pundits you see on TV, Intrade betters can’t afford to simply spew their biased crap without considering reality – after all, losing money gets old pretty quickly. That’s what makes Intrade worthy of our attention.

Now, I’m not saying that Intrade is infallible. For example, at different points in the past year, it was predicting that Hillary Clinton would win the nomination. Then again, for much of 2007, so was I, and I’m an admitted Obamaniac.

In any event, recognizing that Intrade could be wrong, I still think its numbers are more reliable than most. So here they are: Obama 61.3 McCain 34.9.

I won’t reveal my bias by saying that Obama’s odds should even be higher. I’ll just leave you with the numbers. You can figure out for yourselves WHY Obama is such a heavy favorite even though those other numbers you’ll see (the polls) are so close.


Betty C. said...

Very encouraging! I'll send this on to my parents...

Daniel Spiro said...


It truly is encouraging -- and the kind of fact that I suspect even our fellow Robleite, "Youngman," has trouble ignoring.

Youngman appreciates economic markets and the rationality at work when people put their money where their mouths are. He realizes that he might have one subjective impression (McCain will win) and I might have another (Obama will win), but more important than either of our views is the fact that Obama is the clear choice among the betting public.

We'll be talking a lot in the upcoming months about who will "win" the election. And that is the $64,000 question. But I want to ask a much more pleasant question.

Recognizing that there is a substantial possibility that McCain will win (roughly 33%) ... how large is the prospect that Obama won't merely win, but win in a landslide?

After the long, hard slog of the previous several months, it's that latter question that I'd prefer thinking about this morning.