Sunday, June 02, 2013

A Blueprint for a Successful Jewish-Islamic Dialogue Society





This week, I intend to give a brief presentation to an international audience about an organization that is very near and dear to my heart – the Jewish-Islamic Dialogue Society of Washington, or JIDS.  It’s an odd time to write this blogpost, because the JIDS website is in a time of transition, but you can still access it by going to www.jids.org.  

Below is what I intend to say about JIDS, explicitly.  Implicitly, though, my point is that I would encourage efforts to replicate it, or build upon it, in creating Jewish-Islamic dialogue societies in other American cities and around the world.  If any of you would be interested in setting up such a society and would like a sounding board for your ideas, you can e-mail me at creedroom@danielspiro.com.

JIDS has met monthly from about the time Barack Obama became President.  We have sponsored a range of activities in addition to our monthly dialogues, including lectures, film viewings, and various social action events.  For example, during each of the past few years, we have brought together dozens of Jewish and Muslim teenagers from several local synagogues and mosques to clean up public parks or help the homeless.  On one other occasion, we turned over the microphones to a small group of teenagers and let them serve as the rabbis and imams for an entire session.

JIDS is devoted primarily to the idea that Jews and Muslims are first cousins in the family of Abraham, and that we can’t fully practice our own faith unless we steep ourselves in the wisdom of our cousins.  We are proudest of the fact that we have formed a true community.  The members of JIDS provide a safe space where people can speak their minds.  We have matured together as a group of friends, even though we represent a wide range of ideas on matters of faith and of politics. 

So, how did this all come to be? 

First, the group was started by laypeople – not professional clergy.  We didn’t have to worry about losing our jobs if we offended anyone. We could just speak from the heart.  

Second, we were started by people with shared passions.  Especially in a society where so many people have given up on the Holy Name, it was critical that JIDS was formed by folks who adore that Name.    Our founders had a common beloved that was under siege, and that brought us together.  But we also have a number of members who are atheists, and they too are treated with complete respect, because the one thing more important to our founders than honoring the Name is honoring God’s world by dealing with people civilly and warmly.  

Third, our founders were mainstream enough within their faiths that nobody has questioned whether our group authentically represents Jews and Muslims.  I can’t imagine JIDS being led by Muslims who didn’t care deeply about the plight of the Palestinians, say, or Jews who weren’t ardent Zionists.  So even though our membership falls within a wide spectrum of philosophies, our founders had to be within the mainstream of the communities we represent.

Fourth, we keep it real.  We didn’t want to be just another interfaith group that speaks on a level worthy of children.  We aim for intelligent high-level dialogue at all times.  And we don’t whitewash differences between our communities – we embrace those differences.  

When our group started to meet, it wasn’t easy to keep it real.  We realized that we had to build some trust in each other.  So we took on some less controversial topics for a little while, and gradually we worked up to taking on topics like God and the Palestinian/Israeli conflict.    

Right now, we’re going through a series of dialogues entitled “What Unifies Us/What Divides Us.” And you can imagine that has led us to study our philosophies of God, our views about Zionism, and other big issues.  But even when we’re taking on the topics that divide us, we remind ourselves about the many things that bring us together as a family.   For example, we point out that the words Jihad and Israel mean the same thing – spiritual wrestling.  

Ultimately, our success is about playfully challenging one another – “You think God is great?  Well think about THIS way of praising God.”  “You say you believe in peace and justice – well I bet you haven’t considered THIS perspective?”  We play with our differences as if we realize that variety was the spice of life -- as if we take to heart that line in Surah 49 about how God made us into different tribes so that we may know each other and not despise each other.

At JIDS, we learn that the Jewish and Muslim tribes are indeed part of a larger Tribe – more akin to the 12 Tribes of Israel than to being a pair of “enemies.”   Perhaps our group’s proudest accomplishment is in the way it prepares members to work in the struggle for Middle East Peace.  Whereas so many non-JIDS members lose patience, can’t handle being around people with whom they disagree, and end up fighting only for one side of the conflict and not the other, we at JIDS are patient enough not to quit in the fight for peace.  

JIDS forces us to be able to hold both the Israeli Narrative and the Palestinian Narrative in our hearts and in our minds.  We have to do that, because the most important thing for a JIDS member to be able to do isn’t to talk but to listen.  If you come to our meetings, you’ll realize that the presentations don’t go on for very long, and most of the time is spent letting the community members talk.  We’re a dialogue society, not a speaker’s bureau.  We already have enough self-important people in Washington D.C. – we don’t need to encourage that at JIDS.  Believe it or not, we have more important things to consider even than our own intelligence.


I hope that gives you a bit of food for thought.  We need these types of organizations to build trust throughout our world.  If you form one, there will inevitably be growing pains, but as long as you have a committed and supportive core group, you should be fine.  And once you start rolling, I think you’ll find that the meetings are incredibly fulfilling.  

So give it a shot.  Please.   For all of our sakes.

Monday, May 27, 2013

A Memorial Day Message for Peace and Gratitude



A MEMORIAL DAY MESSAGE FOR PEACE AND GRATITUDE      

            This has been an odd Memorial Day weekend for me.   The weather here in the D.C. area has been absolutely poifect.  But for nearly the entire time, I’ve been cooped up in my house working hard on the computer – it might as well have been mid-January.

            The time drain this weekend has been, to be candid, a labor of love.  I’ve put the “finishing touches” on draft number N+1 of the manuscript for my new book.   It’s a “non-fiction book about God.”  How’s that for an oxymoron, my skeptical friends?   Every time I finish a draft, I’m convinced that it’s getting better and better.  But every time I begin working on the next draft, I’m amazed at just how many additional edits I feel compelled to make.  Do you remember that scene from Amadeus when the king tells Mozart that his composition has too many notes, and Mozart retorts that in fact it had just the right number?  All I can say is that it must be nice to be so talented that you feel supremely confident in the quality of your art.   For me, few things are as humbling as the writing process – but since I can’t compose music, paint, or shoot a jump shot … let’s just say that I’m looking forward to working on draft N+2.

            While I’ve been preoccupied with metaphysics and theology, I hope you all have been thinking a bit about the reason why Americans were given this day off.  It’s a day to remember our fallen warriors -- and all the other warriors who gave up their arms, legs, or psychic health in service to their country.  I may not always agree with every war my country enters, but we always need to admire the courage and dedication of the troops who risk everything so that armchair folks like me can philosophize with security.  Thanks to all of you who have served in that capacity, or helped out anyone who has.  And a special thanks to those who have lost your loved ones – you, too, are in our thoughts.

            My own work when it comes to the topic of armed conflict is more in the Prevention Department than in the Winning Department.  There is not much we civilians can do for the war effort, but we at least can devote a lot of time to the fight for peace.  As a Middle East peace activist, I was thrilled to see that Secretary of State Kerry is apparently getting serious about his goal of putting the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks at the top of his agenda.  How serious?  He has now announced a $4 billion economic development plan for the West Bank.   It alone won’t produce peace, but I cannot think of a better start.   

            The plan, according to Kerry, could reduce unemployment in the West Bank by two-thirds.  Who is to say if that’s overly optimistic, but this much I think we can say: the more that the conditions on the ground have kept Palestinians out of the labor force, the easier it has been for extremists to fan the flames of Israel-hatred.  Given that the GDP of the Palestinian territories together add up to only $4 billion, I have to think that Kerry’s proposal would provide a huge economic boost to the West Bank.   

            It is easy to say that peace will never come to that region -- that no less than poverty, war between the Jews and the Arabs “will always be with us.”  But I’m not that pessimistic, and you shouldn’t be either.  We need to build up the economy of the Palestinian territories, support NGOs whose goal is to build trust between the Israeli and Arab streets, and periodically bring the leaders to the negotiating table.  And we need to remember that simply because no end-stage agreement has been reached, that doesn’t mean that progress isn’t being made.  Perhaps, under Kerry’s leadership, we might just see such progress during the next four years.

            On a day like today, we owe it to our troops to support them not only with gratitude but with prayers and hard work.  So let’s pray and work for peace, so they don’t have to fight so many wars.  

And please, let’s make sure that these heroes get the mental health support and the other vital services that they deserve.  It’s great to honor them when they’re dead, but it’s high time that we stepped up to the plate when they’re alive.  

From a humbled non-veteran to all you heroes and your families, thanks again on behalf of the Empathic Rationalist.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Scandalmania




SCANDALMANIA

I’m not a professional wrestling fan and frankly know virtually nothing about that “sport.”  But at least I’ve heard of the term “Wrestlemania.”   When I looked it up this morning to get a little more insight, I read that it refers to an annual wrestling extravaganza that has been going on for nearly three full decades.  It began, believe it or not, with a tag team match featuring, of all people, Mr. T.   The commentator at five of the first six Wrestlemanias was none other than the Governor – Jesse Ventura. This was back when he was Jesse the Body, and not yet Jesse the Mind.   And lest you wonder if Wrestlemania can pack as big a punch in the turnstiles as it does in the ring, consider that on more than ten occasions, attendance has topped 65,000.  Once, in Michigan, over 93,000 people showed up for the festivities.   And why not?  Because when you show up, you may end up seeing not only wrestlers, but major celebrities.  The list of those who have officiated, sung or otherwise performed at these events include Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, Lawrence Taylor, Pete Rose, Ray Charles, Aretha Franklin, Gladys Knight, Willie Nelson, Reba McEntire, Little Richard, John Legend ….   You get the point, Wrestlemania is big-time, mainstream Americana.

And now, we have it beat.  Wrestlemania – meet Scandalmania.

I can’t pick up a newspaper any more without reading about a scandal.  Nor can I turn on  Cable News and expect to go scandal-less. Hell, even on ESPN – more scandals.  Last weekend, being a big Tiger Woods fan, I watched the Players’ Championship.  And after it was over and Tiger won, did anyone on sports radio want to talk about his golf game?  Of course not.  They wanted to talk about how: (a) Sergio Garcia, his playing partner on Saturday, complained that Tiger, while standing dozens of yards away, breached golf etiquette by pulling a club out of the bag when Sergio was about to hit; (b) Tiger claimed that he asked a marshal if Sergio had already hit the ball and didn’t take the club out of the bag until after the marshal said yes; (c) two marshals said on Monday that Tiger never did ask them if Sergio had hit the ball first, and one of these marshals said that Tiger’s misstatement reflected badly on his character; and (d) two other marshals then came to Tiger’s defense, with one of the marshals admitting that he was the one who told Tiger that Sergio had already hit the ball.

Who am I supposed to believe?  Sergio?  Tiger?  The first set of marshals?  The second?  What’s a scandal-sipping, fact-checking, judgmental schmuck like me to do?

OK.  Let me get serious for a moment.  I don’t wish to downplay the importance of any of the reported events of the past fortnight.  Nor do I wish to suggest that they are important.  On substance, I’m going to stay neutral on all of the reported stories – from the governmental scandals to the war of words at the TPC Sawgrass Golf Course.  My point is simply that just as those of us who wanted to hear about the actual golf recognize that there is more to a tournament than the stuff described above, those of us who care about this country’s governance recognize that there are issues aside from the reporting of scandals.   And we cannot afford to spend the entire second term of Obama’s Presidency dealing with scandals.   In fact, we cannot afford to spend the entire second term of Obama’s Presidency dealing with what the media and other talking heads think of Obama’s Presidency.  Believe it or not, this country actually needs the government to do things.   Economically, environmentally, geopolitically … we have a TON of work to do.   And nobody seems to think that any of this work is urgent – other than dealing with scandals.  

No, my friends, just like sports fans can’t live on “Wrestlemania” alone, the American public cannot satiate itself solely with Scandalmania.  I’m not suggesting that all of the recent scandals are as phony as professional wrestling.  (Remember – I’m staying neutral on that point.) But even if there were ten scandals and each one rose to the Watergate level, they still shouldn’t occupy all of our attention.  Let’s not forget the bigger picture, folks – our soldiers are in harms’ way in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria remain engulfed in violence, Pakistan has a zillion nukes, Israel and Palestine have been at war for 65 years and counting, the world is passing horrific climate change milestones, we are seeing horrible economic inequities domestically of the kind that would make Dickens begin to take note, we have a huge National Debt,  nearly everyone agrees that there is a crying need for immigration reform, our nation is awash in assault weapons and mentally-ill firearms owners ….

Like I said, we have a lot on our plate.  Let’s not forget that the next time we begin to sink our teeth into Scandal number N+1.   

Saturday, May 11, 2013

The Grim Numbers



THE GRIM NUMBERS

There are many things to be depressed about today.  Number one should probably be the fact that for the first time in millions of years, the average daily level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has reached 400 parts per million.   And number two – a solid second – is the extent to which we now live in polarized societies characterized by widespread disrespect and fear.   Here in America, that is reflected in the trials and tribulations of Capitol Hill, where our lawmakers have trouble agreeing on just about anything (save, perhaps, for their love of the Washington Nationals).  But such polarization is hardly limited to America.  It is a worldwide epidemic.  And never did the extent of that problem become as apparent to me as when I read a report from the Pew Research Global Attitudes Project.  

If you want to see the horrific facts for yourself, go to http://www.pewglobal.org/2011/07/21/muslim-western-tensions-persist/.  As the saying goes, “read it and weep.”  Yes, the survey is nearly two years old, but I suspect that if anything, the numbers are only getting worse over time, not better.  If you want a highlight – or should I say a “lowlight” – look at the table where Pew asked people from different countries whether they had a favorable view of Muslims, Christians and Jews.   The percentages of folks in Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, the Palestinian Territories, Pakistan and Indonesia who had a favorable view of Muslims ranged from a low of 72% in Turkey to more than 90% in all those other countries.  For Christians, it dips to lows of 6% in Turkey and 16% in Pakistan, but increases to 96% in Lebanon.  And for Jews?   The percentages in the above countries who feel favorable about my tribe are 4, 2, 2, 3, 4, 2 and 9, respectively.  Thank God for those loving Indonesians – because if not for them, one might think that more than 24 out of 25 of the world’s Muslims don’t like Jews.  

Ah, but we Jews have our own prejudices, apparently.  In Israel, the percentage who felt favorably toward Jews was 88 and the percentage who felt favorably toward Muslims was a mere 19.  Yes, that’s nearly 10 times as high as the proportion of people who liked Jews in Jordan, Egypt or Pakistan – but it’s not exactly what was meant by “loving thy neighbor as thyself,” if you get my drift.

As I think about this survey, I can at least offer some good news – of the fourteen countries surveyed, the United States was one of only four where most of the respondents had a favorable view of Jews, Christians AND Muslims.  The number for Muslims was only 57% -- compared to more than 80% for Jews and Christians – but still, that suggests that Americans tend not to dislike people because of their religion.  As I have mentioned before, much of that credit goes to President George W. Bush, who for all his mistakes as a President (and there was no small number), made the fateful and beautiful decision after 9/11 to reassure the nation that the problem was NOT Islam but rather a certain extremist perversion of that religion.   Most Americans, apparently, bought that message.

In reflecting on the above numbers, I must say that I am really upset with the 2’s, 3, and 4’s that the Pew Survey reported from the Arab world.  As a Jew who coordinates the Jewish-Islamic Dialogue Society of Washington, I am incredibly disappointed with my Arab cousins in learning about those numbers.  Clearly, this survey suggests that Arabs don’t merely disagree with Zionism or the conduct of the Israeli Government, but are flat out anti-Jewish.  You hardly have to be a historian to be scared when such figures are reported.

But as an American, I feel that my own country has some work to do when it comes to the issue of Islamophobia.  A 43% non-favorability rating is not acceptable.  That’s three out of seven Americans, which is three too many.   How do we get the number down?   Perhaps we begin by considering the constant references in the media to words like “Jihadis” and “Islamists.”   Jihad is a beloved word in Islam and it does NOT generally refer to a violent struggle, but rather to an internal, spiritual, and peaceful struggle to be the best people we can be.  Unfortunately, most Americans don’t know that.  Similarly, “Islamists” sounds so much like “followers of Islam” that you can understand why so many Americans associate the religion generally with violent extremism.

Clearly, we need to come up with better words for the sickening philosophy adopted by Osama and his ilk.  “Extremist Islam” or “A Perverted, Extremist form of Islam” don’t exactly roll off the tongue, so I appreciate why members of the media want to use shorthand in reference to that philosophy.  But we need a different type of shorthand – we can’t continue to use words that associate a holy belief system with a perverted, violent philosophy and not expect to produce a whole lot of bigots.

Ultimately, that’s surely the problem in the Arab world when it comes to their attitudes about Jews.  They associate Jews with the state of Israel, which is spoken of much in the same way that we Americans speak of North Korea – as blight on the world.  Personally, I like to refer to myself as “Pro-Israel, Pro-Palestine.”  Yet to most Arabs and Jews, that expression is almost nonsensical.  It would be like saying “Pro Indian, Pro Custer.”   You can’t be “pro” both sets of enemies.  And the reality is, in the Middle East, Arabs and Jews see themselves as enemies, not cousins.  That is precisely what we in the peace movement need to change.

It is sad whenever you see people define themselves based on who they hate, rather than what they agree with.   All you have to do is turn on American talk radio and you can see that this problem isn’t limited to the Middle East.  In essence, our society is reaching our own milestone of toxicity – our own analogue of 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide.  Let’s just say our society is no less sick than our planet.  So, if you’re into nurturing, rest assured – there’s plenty of work to do everywhere you look.