IT’S HARD TO BE PRO ISRAEL AND PRO PALESTINE – BUT WE
MUST TRY
So, mark down November
29, 2012 on your calendar. Today is the
day that Palestine officially became a state.
By an overwhelming majority, the
UN General Assembly voted to upgrade the status of the Palestinian Authority from
"non-member observer entity" to "non-member observer state.” It now has the same legal status as the
Vatican.
I, for one, rejoice in
the UN vote. I still haven’t seen the
final version of the resolution itself, but the precise wording wouldn’t affect
my celebration of the vote. I am willing
to assume for the sake of argument that the resolution could have some
offensive verbiage. That’s of little
concern to me when compared to the symbolic significance of knowing that the
Palestinian people are no longer stateless.
No group of people should have to live like that. As a Jew, I appreciate all too well what it
means to be stateless. Spinoza’s Jewish
community in Amsterdam was considered part of the “Portuguese Nation,”
indicating not only where they emigrated from, but also the fact that they were
NOT truly part of Holland. West Bank and Gaza Strip Palestinians are
clearly not part of Israel. How, then,
can we Jews keep from allowing them to have their own state? And why not recognize the existence of that
state today?
To me, my fellow Zionists
have a fundamental decision to make: do we or don’t we want to recognize that
the Palestinians also possess a legitimate claim to the disputed land. If our answer is yes, we should support the
existence of a Palestinian state side by side a Jewish one. If our answer is no, we are truly in
denial. The Palestinians should not
singlehandedly be asked to pay the price for the way Jews have been mistreated
over time. Even if we recognize that the
United Nations was within its rights to give the Jews their ancestral homeland out
of, in essence, eminent domain principles, we would have to note that the UN
intended to create two states for two peoples.
To me, being pro-Israel
and pro-Zionism compels us to support the aspirations of Palestinian
statehood. We cannot rejoice in our own
liberty until our neighbors and cousins are able to rejoice in theirs. I don’t feel threatened by the symbolic
statement that the Palestinian people have their own state. Why feel threatened? There is still a wall separating the two
states. Frankly, I think it is sad that countries like
the U.S. and Germany – which, happily, tend to sympathize with Israeli
interests – felt the need to oppose the resolution and thereby take a stand
that isn’t so much pro-Israel as anti-Palestine.
Viva the Palestinian
State! May it live long and prosper.
But just as many people
find it difficult to be pro-Israel without being anti-Palestine, the reverse is
also true. And today, while I would like
to relax and celebrate this wonderful, historic development, I can’t help but
reflect on the way that many Palestinian “peace activists” are taking the
news. You got it – they’re not just
celebrating the creation of the Palestinian state, but taking the opportunity
to lambast the state of Israel.
If many in the Middle
East Peace movement are to be believed, the sole reason why we don’t have peace
in the Holy Land is because of Israel.
The Palestinians bear little if any responsibility for the continuation
of the conflict. According to this
allegedly “pro-peace” meme, Israel is an imperialist and ruthless power that
thinks nothing of oppressing their innocent neighbors, and is completely
hypocritical when it comes to its alleged support of the two-state
solution. As for the Palestinians, they
are to be analogized to the Native Americans prior to the Trail of Tears, or to
the Southern blacks in anti-bellum America.
These peace activists paint a picture of good versus evil that is as
black-and-white as a children’s book.
My friends, I am not
going to apologize for everything Israel does.
I certainly won’t apologize for those damned West Bank settlements, or
even for Israel’s behavior in strongly opposing today’s resolution. But let me remind you that Israel was not the
one that recently initiated violence against the Palestinians, Israel is not
the one who is refusing to get back to the bargaining table, and Israel has
made it clear that it would be a tremendous pro-peace statement if the
Palestinians were simply to recognize Israel as a Jewish State. Yet the Palestinians refuse.
I am not going to
apologize for that either.
Nor will I join in the
chorus from the left of advocating boycotts against Israel, applying double
standards invidiously against Israel, and assuming that Israel is responsible
for making major concessions for peace but not the Palestinians. That’s not being pro-Palestinian; that’s
being anti-Israel.
At a dinner party that
I attended last weekend, a bunch of Jews were trying to figure out just the
right phrase to describe a Jew who is always blaming Israel and never the
Palestinians. It was decided that “traitor”
was too strong, and “self-hating Jew” was also inapposite (after all, the
blame-Israel-first Jews aren’t necessarily anti-Jewish either culturally or
religiously). Then, someone thought to refer
to these blame-Israel-firsters as “Useful Idiots.” It’s a term that was used by the Russian
Marxists to mock the communist sympathizers in the western world – in other
words, to mock their own clueless supporters.
And nobody could argue with that term in this context. When the shoe fits ….
Folks, if you want to
see peace in the region, don’t think perfect justice. Think perfect balance. Think about bringing both sides to the
table, giving each one what they reasonably need, and denying each one what
their own extremists want. Ensure that
nothing happens that threatens security interests. But encourage both sides to make concessions
now, even unilateral concessions, in the hope that they will serve as a
springboard for concessions from the other side. And above all else, rejoice in
ANYTHING that benefits one of these peoples without threatening the other.
Palestinian Statehood
doesn’t threaten Israel. Let’s support
it. And the Jewish State.